Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Productive Potentials of Nigerian Indigenous Chickens Versus Rhode Island Red Chicken Reared Southern Guinea Savanna Environment of Nigeria
Current Issue
Volume 2, 2017
Issue 5 (October)
Pages: 49-55   |   Vol. 2, No. 5, October 2017   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 49   Since Aug. 28, 2017 Views: 1459   Since Aug. 28, 2017
Authors
[1]
Amao Shola Rasheed, Department of Agricultural Education (Animal Sci. Division; Animal Breeding and Genetics Unit), School of Vocational and Technical Education, Emmanuel Alayande College of Education, Oyo, Nigeria.
Abstract
The study was conducted to assess the preliminary evaluation of productive potentials of Nigerian indigenous chicken breeds versus Rhode Island Red chicken reared Southern Guinea Savanna environment of Nigeria. A total of 937 day-old local chickens generated from a main cross of local chickens possessing some major genes; naked-neck (NN x NN), frizzle (FF x FF), normal feathered gene (NF x NF), Fulani ecotype (FE x FE) and exotic birds (RIR x RIR) were used to evaluate the productive potential of the pullets in a randomized complete block design. The genetic groups produced were homozygous naked neck, (NN), frizzled (FF), normal feathered (NF), fulani ecotype (FE) and Rhode Island Red (RIR) chickens. Significant (p<0.05) difference in body weight, daily feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion ratio were observed among genotypes and as expected, RIR crosses outstands bodyweight (1402 g), consuming more feed (98.33g), weight gain of 15.69 g with feed conversion ratio of 0.15 and average egg weight (54.02 g) than other genetic groups. Among the local birds, NN crosses were superior in growth performance and egg production parameters than other indigenous birds. NN crosses lay earlier (152 day) than other genetic groups and FE crosses had better fertility (86.65%) and hatchability (89.07%) traits compared with all their counterpart genotypes while body weight at first egg was highest and lowest for RIR crosses (1342.86 g) and NF crosses (1255.89 g) respectively. This result depicts that the Nigerian indigenous chickens especially naked neck genotype had a better productive performance among the Nigerian indigenous chicken which may be involved in breeding for developing native foundation stock with RIR exotic birds for production of egg type chicken in this southern guinea savanna region of Nigeria.
Keywords
Indigenous Chicken, Growth Performance, Egg Production, Reproductive Traits, Rhode Island Red Chicken
Reference
[1]
Ogbu, C. C., Nwachukwu, E. N. and Nwosu, C. C (2015). Variance components and heritability of some growth parameters in purebred Nigerian indigenous chickens. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 10 (5): 193-199.
[2]
Qureshi, N. and Krishna, D. (2015). Evaluation of Naked neck x Polish cap cross for growth, egg production and egg quality traits under intensive system of rearing. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5 (6): 273-279.
[3]
Islam, M. A. and Nishibori, M. (2009). Indigenous naked neck chicken: a valuable genetic resource for Bangladesh. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 65: 125-138.
[4]
Ogbu, C. C. (2012). Effect of positive assortative mating on between and within line variation in performance traits of the Nigerian indigenous chickens (NIC). International Journal of Science and Nature, 3 (1): 20-23.
[5]
Oguike, M. A.. Ndubueze, A. N. and lbe, S. N. (2000). Semen quality of different genotypes of Nigerian local cocks. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 2 (2): 310-313.
[6]
Ajayi, F. O. (2010). Nigerian indigenous chicken: A valuable genetic resource for meat and egg production. Asian Journal Poultry Science, 4: 164-172.
[7]
Adedeji, O. S., Ameen, S. A. and Oyebanji, B. O. (2008). Essential of health management techniques in Livestock. Ogbomoso, Ola Printers. Pp 96-97.
[8]
Oke, U. K. (2011). Influence of some major genes on growth traits of local pullets in humid tropical environment. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, (4): 570-576.
[9]
Fassill, B., Adnoy, T., Gjoen, H. M., Kathl, J. and Abebe, G. (2010). Production performance of dual purpose crosses of two indigenous with two exotic chicken breeds in Subtropical environment. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9 (7): 702-710.
[10]
Agu, C. I., Ndofor-Foleng, H. M. and Nwosu, C. C. (2012). Evaluation of economic traits in progenies of Nigerian heavy ecotype chicken as genetic material for development of rural poultry production. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11 (39): 9501-9507.
[11]
Momoh, O. M., Ehobu, N. G. and Nwosu, C. C. (2007). Egg production of two local chicken ecotypes under improved management. Proceedings of 32nd Ann. Conf. of Nig. Soc. Anim. Prod. Calabar, pp: 149-151.
[12]
Egahi, J. O., Dim, N. I., Momoh, O. M. and Gwaza, D. S. (2010). Variations in qualitative traits in the Nigerian local chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9 (10): 978-979.
[13]
Eman, R. K. (2016). Comparative study of growth and economic performance of Fayoumi, Rhode Island Red and their reciprocal crossbred chickens. International Journal of Current Research, 8 (05): 30613-30619.
[14]
Amao, S. R. (2017). Egg production and growth performance of naked neck and Rhode Island Red chickens under Southern Guinea Savanna condition of Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Earth Science, 3 (2): 1-10.
[15]
Isidahomen, C. E., Njidda, A. A. and Olatunji, E. A. (2013). Egg quality traits of indigenous and exotic chickens as influenced by specific genes. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 3 (1): 53-57.
[16]
Amao, S. R., Ojedapo, L. O., Adedeji, T. A. and Olugbemiga, K. S. (2016). Preliminary appraisal of egg quality indices of Nigerian locally adapted chickens in Oyo metropolis, southern guinea savanna zone of Nigeria. 41st Annual Conference of the Nigerian Society for Animal Production held at Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta. March, 20th –24th, 2016. 41: 31-34.
[17]
Adedeji, T. A., Amao, S. R., Popoola, A. D. and Ogundipe, R. I. (2015). Fertility, hatchability and eggs quality traits of Nigerian locally adapted chickens in the derived savanna environment of Nigeria. International Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health Sciences, 5 (17): 36-42.
[18]
SAS (2009). Statistical Analysis System (SAS) users guide, version 9.4, SAS institute, Cary NC, USA.
[19]
Khawaja, T., Khan, S. H., Mukhtar, N. and Parveen, A. (2012). Comparative study of growth performance, meat quality and haematological parameters of Fayoumi, Rhode Island Red and their reciprocal crossbred chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 11 (39): 211.
[20]
Halima, H., Neser, F. W. C., de Kock, A. and Van Marle-Köster, E., (2006). Growth performance of indigenous chickens under intensive management conditions in Northwest Ethiopia. Southern African Journal of Animal Science, 36 (Suppl. 1): 71-73.
[21]
Adebibu, I. I. and Ayorinde, K. L. 2011. Sexual dimorphism in predicting body weight of two broiler strains. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science 13: 11-22.
[22]
Nwachukwu, E. N., Ibe, S. N., Ejekwu, K. and Oke, U. K. (2006). Evaluation of growth parameters of main and reciprocal crossbred normal, naked neck and frizzle chickens in a humid tropical environment. Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances, 5: 542-546.
[23]
Garces, A., Casey, N. H. and Horst, P., (2001). Productive performance of naked neck, frizzle and dwarf laying hens under various natural climates and two nutritional treatments. Southern African Journal of Animal Science, 31: 174-180.
[24]
Fayeye, T. R., Ayorinde, K. L. Ojo, V. and Adesina, O. M., (2006). Frequency and influence of some major genes on body weight and body size parameters of Nigerian indigenous chickens. Livestock Research Rural Development, 18: 23-26. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/3/faye18037.htm.
[25]
Thutwa, K., Nsoso, S. J., Kgwatalala, P. M. and Moreki, J. C. (2012). Comparative live weight, growth performance, feed intake, carcass traits and meat quality in two strains of Tswana chickens raised under intensive system in south east district of Botswana. International Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 1 (1): 21-26.
[26]
Oke, U. K. (2011a). Influence of some major genes on early lay traits of crossbred local pullets in a humid tropical environment. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research. 1 (3): 92-98.
[27]
Ibe, S. N (1993). Growth performance of normal, frizzle and naked neck chickens in a tropical environment. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 20: 25-31.
[28]
Shafik, B. M. N., El-Bayomi, Kh. M., Sosa, G. A. and Osman, A. M. R. (2013). Effect of crossing Fayoumi and Rhode Island Red on growth performance, egg and reproductive traits under Egyptian conditions. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 24 (2): 11-18.
[29]
Tadesse, D., Singh, H., Mengistu, A., Esatu, W. and Tadelle, D. (2013). Study on productive performances and egg quality traits of exotic chickens under village production system in East Shewa, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8 (13): 1123-1128.
[30]
Melesse, A., Alewi, M. and Teklegiorgris, Y. (2013). Evaluating the reproductive and egg production traits of local chicken and their F1 crosses with Rhode Island and Fayoumi breeds under farmers’ management conditions. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 3 (2): 379-385.
[31]
Adedokun, S. A. and Sonaiya, E. B. (2001). Comparison of the performance of Nigerian chickens from the three agro-ecological zones. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 13: 1-6.
[32]
Udoh, U. H., Nwaogwugwu, U. C. and Esiet, E. S. (2012). Egg laying characteristics of three (naked neck, normal feathered and frizzled feather) Nigerian local chickens. Journal of Agriculture, Biotechnology and Ecology. 5 (2): 93-99.
[33]
Melesse, A., Maak S., Schmidt, R. and von Lengerken, G. (2011). Effect of long-term heat stress on some performance traits and plasma enzyme activities in Naked-Neck chickens and their F1 crosses with commercial layer breeds. Livestock Science Journal, 141: 227-231.
[34]
Padhi, M. K., Chatterjee, R. N and Rajkumar, U. (2014). A study on performance of a crossbred chicken developed using both exotic and indigenous breeds under backyard system of rearing. Journal of Poultry Science and Technology, 2 (2): 26-29.
[35]
Vivian, U. O. (2011). Estimation of genetic parameter and selection for egg production traits in a Nigerian local chicken ecotype. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences. 6 (12): 54-57.
[36]
Ahmed, F. M., Nishibor, I. M. and Islam, M. A. (2012). Production and price of indigenous naked neck and full feathered chicken reared under rural scavenging system Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 4 (4): 92-97.
[37]
Ukwu, H. O. and Ibe, S. N. (2012). Relationship between markers and quantitative traits in the Nigerian local chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 22: 48-58.
[38]
FAO. (2010). Food and Agricultural Organization. Indigenous chicken genetic resources in Bangladesh: current status and future outlook. Bogra. Mannual version. pp. 6.
[39]
Matiwos, H., Negassi, A and Solomon, D. (2013). Production performance of local and exotic breeds of chicken in rural household level in Nole KabbaWoreda, western wollega, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agriculture, 8 (11): 1014-1021.
[40]
Miazi, O. F., Miah, G., Miazi, M. M., Uddin, M. M., Hassan, M. M. and Faridahsan, M. (2012). Fertility and hatchability of Fayoumi and Sonali chicks. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science, 2 (5): 83-86.
[41]
Bobbo. A. G., Yahaya, M. S. and Baba, S. S. (2013). Comparative assessment of fertility and hatchability traits of three phenotypes of local chickens. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSRJAVS), 4 (2): 22-28.
[42]
Sayda A. M. A. (2012). Family poultry as a tool in alleviating environmental hazards in settled areas of Transhumant families in Gezira scheme Sudan. Asian Journal of Rural Development, 2: 1-12.
[43]
Yakubu, A., Ogah, D. M. and Barde, R. E. (2008). Productivity and egg quality characteristics of free range naked neck and normal feathered Nigerian Indigenous chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7 (6): 579-585.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved