Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
Impact of Audit Fees on Audit Quality of Conglomerates Companies in Nigeria
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2018
Issue 1 (March)
Pages: 1-8   |   Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 46   Since Apr. 27, 2018 Views: 461   Since Apr. 27, 2018
Mohammed Ibrahim, Department of Accounting, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria.
Ibrahim Ali, Department of Accounting, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria.
Audit failures such as in the case of Enron Corporation, WorldCom Corporation, Global Crossing, ImClone Systems Incorporation and Tyco International have raised concerns on the auditors' ability in discharging their duties. Emergent economies are not exceptional from large corporate failures; for instance the corporate failures in the Nigerian financial sector in the early 1990s brought auditors into sharp focus and caused the public to question the role of accountants and auditors. This study assessed the impact of audit fees on audit quality of listed conglomerates in Nigeria over the periods 2004 to 2015. Data for the study were collected from the annual reports and accounts of the companies. A panel data was employed specifically using, OLS and Random Effect regressions. The paper observed that both audit fees and audit firm size have positive impact on company audit quality. The paper suggested the need for regulatory bodies in line with best practices to look critically into proper modalities for charging audit fees that is commensurate with the audit effort.
Audit Fees, Audit Quality, Audit Tenure, Discretionary Accruals
Abdul-Rahman, O. A., Benjamin, A. O. & Olayinka, O. H., 2017. Effect of Audit Fees on Audit Quality: Evidence from Cement Companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 5 (1), pp. 6-17.
Afesha, T., 2014. Audit Fees Determinants and Audit Quality in Ethiopian Commercial Banks, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: s.n.
Al-Ajmi, J., 2009. Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, Volume 25, pp. 64-74.
Asthana, S. C. & Boone, J. P., 2012. Abnormal Audit Fee and Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31 (3), p. 1–22.
Beatty, R. P., 1989. Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings. The Accounting Review, 64 (4), pp. 693-709.
Becker, C., DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J. & Subramanyam, K., 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (1), p. 1–24.
Boeijink, T., 2011. The Impact of Excess Auditor Remuneration and Audit Qualification, Tilburg, Netherland: s.n.
CAMA, 2004. Companies & Allied Matters Act Cap C 20, LFN.
Chen, H. & Wang, X., 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance in China: An Empirical Research from Chinese Firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 11 (4), p. 361–370.
Choi, J., Kim, J. & Zang, Y., 2010. Audit Office Size, Audit Quality, and Audit Pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29 (1), pp. 73-97.
DeAngelo, L. E., 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (3), pp. 183-199.
Dechow, P., Sloan, R. & Sweeney, A., 1995. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, Volume 70, p. 193–225.
Dehkordi, H. F. & Makarem, N., 2011. The Effect of Size and Type of Auditor on Audit Quality. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Volume 80, pp. 121-137.
Dopuch, N. & Simunic, D., 1982. Competition in Auditing: An Assessment, Urbana-Champaign: s.n.
Enofe, A. O., Mgbame, C., Aderin, A. & Ehi-Oshio, O. U., 2013. Determinants of Audit Quality in the Nigerian Business Environment. Research Journal of Financial Accounting, 4 (4), pp. 1697-2222.
Eshleman, J. D. & Guo, P., 2013. Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality: The Importance of Considering Managerial Incentives in Tests of Earnings Management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33 (1), pp. 117-138.
Francis, J. R., 2011. A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30 (2), pp. 125-152.
Francis, J. R. & Krishnan, J., 1999. Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16 (1), p. 135–165.
Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L. & Sparks, H. C., 1999. The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18 (2), p. 17–34.
Hakim, F. & Omri, A., 2010. Quality of the External Auditor, Information Asymmetry and Bid-ask spread. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 18 (1), pp. 5-18.
Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A. & Barragato, C. A., 2007. Auditor Fees and Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22 (8), pp. 761-786.
Ilaboya, O. J. & Okoye, F. A., 2015. Relationship between Audit Firm Size, Non-Audit Services and Audit Quality. DBA Africa Management Review, 5 (1), pp. 1-10.
Iyer, V. M. & Rama, D. V., 2004. Clients' Expectations on Audit Judgements: A Note. Behavioral Research in Accounting, Volume 17, pp. 63-74.
James, I. O. & Izien, O. F., 2014. Audit Firm Characteristics and Audit Quality in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 3 (5), pp. 187-195.
Karsemeijer, M., 2012. The Relation between Audit Fee and Audit Quality, Amsterdam: s.n.
Kimeli, E. K., 2016. Determinants of Audit Fees Pricing: Evidence from Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE). International Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 3 (1), pp. 23-35.
Koh, K., Rajgopal, S. & Srinivasan, S., 2013. Non-audit Services and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from 1978 to 1980. Review of Accounting Studies, 18 (1), pp. 1-33.
Kraub, P., Pronobis, P. & Zulch, H., 2015. Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality in German Audit Market. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 85 (1), pp. 45-84.
Krishnan, J. & Schauer, P., 2000. The Differentiation of Quality among Auditors: Evidence from the Not-for-profit Sector. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 19 (2), p. 9–25.
Lyon, A. & Maher, B., 2005. The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct. Journal of Accounting Research, 43 (1), pp. 133-151.
Moore, G. & Scott, W. R., 1989. Auditors' Legal Liability, Collusion with Management and Investors' Loss. Contemporary Accounting Research, Volume Spring, pp. 754-774.
Muhammad, L. M., 2011. Corporate Board Structure and Financing Decisions of Firms: A Panel Data Analysis.. The Nigerian Horizon, 4 (2), pp. 19-39.
Oladipupo, A. O. & Monye-Emina, H. E., 2016. Do Abnormal Audit Fees Matter in Nigerian Audit Market?. International Journal of Business and Finance Management Research, Volume 4, pp. 64-73.
Olarinoye, S. A. & Ahmad, A. C., 2016. Audit Fees, Corporate Governance Mechanisms, and Financial Reporting Quality in Nigeria. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 26 (1), pp. 1-14.
Rahmina, L. Y. & Agoes, S., 2014. Influence of Auditor Independence, Audit Tenure and Audit Fee on Audit Quality of Members of Capital Market Accountant Forum in Indonesia. Kuala Lumpr, Malaysia, s.n., p. 324–331.
Samaila, I. A., 2014. Corporate Governance and financial Reporting quality in The Nigerian Oil Marketing Industry., s.l.: s.n.
Sawan, N. & Alsaqqa, I., 2013. Audit Firm Size and Quality: Does Audit Firm Size Influence Audit Quality in the Libyan Oil Industry?. African Journal of Business Management, 7 (3), pp. 213-226.
Schauer, P. C., 2002. The Effect of Industry Specialization on Audit Quality: An Examination using Bid-ask-spreads. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 10 (1), pp. 76-86.
Titman, S. & Trueman, B., 1986. Information Quality and the Valuation of New Issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, pp. 159-172.
Turley, S. & Willekens, M., 2008. Auditing, Trust and Governance: Regulation in Europe. Oxon, England: Routledge.
Zhang, Y., 2014. The Empirical Research of Abnormal Audit Fee and Audit Quality based on Chines Manufacturing Listed Companies. s.l., s.n., pp. 667-672.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved