Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
A Life Cycle Cost Analysis Model of Goods Movement for the Gulf Cooperation Council Region
Current Issue
Volume 4, 2017
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 6-16   |   Vol. 4, No. 2, April 2017   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 35   Since Jun. 6, 2017 Views: 630   Since Jun. 6, 2017
Authors
[1]
Hasan Tayyeb, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
[2]
Abd El Halim Omar Abd El Halim, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
[3]
Said Easa, Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
In this article, a total life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) were developed covering two transportation systems: trucking and railway within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. GCC region is a regional intergovernmental political and economic union consists of six countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman). In general and based on statistics, the GCC regional economy is expected to grow due to the increase in aggregate supply and demand. So, there is a need to build a solid foundation of transportation systems that can help in transforming this region into a logistics hub. Therefore, different analysis were discussed in order to be able to select more reliable and appropriate mode of shipping between the GCC. Beside the main cost factors that which includes the capital, operational, maintenance and depreciation costs. Other factors such as, border delays, emissions, noise and safety factors were added to the analysis. The results shows that, shipping using trucking system can be cheaper when shipping commodities between the GCC region, but at the same time considering border delays and emission produced, railways and intermodal modal systems prove to be more reliable. Moreover, shipping bulk commodities favor the rail and intermodal systems due to the payload capacity besides the flexibility of finding the most efficient way to move the shipments between origin and destinations.
Keywords
Rail, Truck, Freight, Intermodal, Cost, Transportation, Life Cycle
Reference
[1]
Forkenbrock, D. J. (2001). Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 321-337.
[2]
Kim, N. S. (2009). Assessment of CO2 emissions for truck-only and rail-based intermodal freight systems in Europe.. Transportation planning and technology, 313-333.
[3]
Brogan, J. J. et al. (2001), Application of a Statewide Intermodal freight planning methodology, report, Virginia transportation research council, Charlottesville, VA 22903, 1-66.
[4]
Significance, V. U. (2012). Values of time and reliability in passenger and freight transport in the Netherlands. Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment.
[5]
Fender, K. J. (2012). An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: A 2012 Update.
[6]
Cenek, P. D. (2012). Freight transport efficiency:. A comparative study of coastal shipping, rail and road modes.
[7]
Rwakarehe, E. E. (2014). Development of a Freight Demand Model for the Province of Alberta Using Public Sources of Data. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 695-705.
[8]
Etihad Rail Freight Transport. Pricing, Regulation and Economic Impact, UAE, 2014.
[9]
Google earth. GCC Region, 21° 54’ 49.40”N, and 45° 20’ 50.00R, Eye alt 3525.84 km, 2016.
[10]
Abu Dhabi Municipality. GCC Railway Freight Traffic Forecast Study, UAE, 2012.
[11]
Fabrycky, W. J. Life-cycle cost and economic analysis. Prentice Hall, 1991.
[12]
Gasoline and diesel prices by country. (2016), GlobalPetrolPrices.com. Retrieved September 15, 2016, from http://www.globalpetrolprices.com/.
[13]
Cargo - Port Facilities Rates & Tariffs, SECTION VI - LOADING & UNLOADING (RULES, REGULATIONS & CHARGES), Port of New Orleans - Louisiana, USA, 2012.
[14]
World Bank document. Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook. Washington, D.C, 1998.
[15]
National Research Council (US). Committee for Study of Public Policy for Surface Freight Transportation, & Transportation Research Board, Paying Our Way: Estimating Marginal Social Costs of Freight Transportation, Special Report 246 (No. 246). Transportation Research Board, 1996.
[16]
United States Environmental Protection Agency. U.S Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2013, Washington, D.C, 2013.
[17]
Saudi Railways Organization (SRO). General Operation Department, Dammam – Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2016.
[18]
GCC railway Impact study. Environmental Impact Assessment- General, CANARAIL, Canada, 2013.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved