Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Environmental Consequences Related to Poor Adherence to Standard Mining Practices by Artisanal and Small Scale Miners: The Case of Ashiraq Mines, Tanzania
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2016
Issue 3 (November)
Pages: 14-19   |   Vol. 3, No. 3, November 2016   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 91   Since Oct. 10, 2016 Views: 1381   Since Oct. 10, 2016
Authors
[1]
Meserecordias W. J. Lema, College of Earth Sciences, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Abstract
This study assesses the contribution of small scale mining towards environmental degradation. Field observation, insitu measurements and laboratory analysis were conducted to determine environmental consequences caused by poor adherence to standard mining practices by artisanal and small scale miners in Ashiraq Mines in Tanzania. Field observation revealed significant land and soil disturbance in the study area such as the existence of abandoned old workings. Direct measurements of pH values for water samples from the nearby river revealed higher acidity on the downstream than the upstream side of the river. Estimates of Mercury concentrations in the atmosphere showed a significant addition of Mercury due to amalgam burning. Also laboratory analysis of water samples from the nearby river was done using the Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) to determine Mercury contents in surface water. The analysis revealed high levels of Mercury concentrations in downstream water above recommended values. Mercury contents for the upstream samples were relatively lower than the upstream values but also lower than the recommended values. The study also recommends different measures to be undertaken by regulatory authorities to improve awareness and adherence to standard mining practices for artisanal and small scale miners, to reduce environmental consequences related to small scale mining.
Keywords
Mining Regulations, Standard Mining Practices, Artisanal, Small Scale Mining
Reference
[1]
MEM-MIIG (2015). Ministry of Energy and Minerals. Mining Industry Investor’s Guide.
[2]
MEM-MS-EIA (2014). Ministry of Energy and Minerals. Mineral Sector Environmental Impacts Assessment Guidelines.
[3]
MEM (2016). Ministry of Energy and Minerals. Minerals Overview.
[4]
Masanja, P. M. (2013). ASM Activities and Management in Tanzania. Presented at: The International Conference on public private partnerships for sustainable development: Toward a framework for resource extraction industries.
[5]
Speiser, A. (2000). Small-scale mining: the situation in Namibia.
[6]
Mutagwaba, W. (2006). Analysis of the benefits and challenges of implementing environmental regulatory programmes for mining: Tanzania case study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 14 (3): 397-404.
[7]
MR (2010). Mining (Environmental Protection of Small Scale Mining) Regulations.
[8]
URT (2016). Nzega District. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nzega_District (last access: September 2016).
[9]
Olson, M. L., and DeWild, J. F. (1999). Techniques for the collection and species-specific analysis of low levels of mercury in water, sediment, and biota. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report. 99-4018.
[10]
Horvat, M., Liang, L., and Bloom, N. S. (1993). Comparison of distillation with other current isolation methods for the determination of methyl mercury compounds in low-level environmental samples. Analytica Chimica Acta. 282: 153-168.
[11]
UNEP (2008). United Nations Environmental Programme. The Global Atmospheric Mercury Assessment: Sources, Emissions and Transport, UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland.
[12]
UNEP (2013). United Nations Environmental Programme. Global Mercury Assessment 2013: Sources, Emissions, Releases and Environmental Transport, UNEP Chemicals Branch, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
[13]
US-EPA (2006). United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s Roadmap for Mercury. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/mercury/archive/roadmap/pdfs/FINAL-Mercury-Roadmap-6-29.pdf (last access: 1 September 2016).
[14]
Cohen, M., Artz, R., Draxler, R., Miller, P., Poissant, L., Niemi, D., Ratte, D., Deslauriers, M., Duval, R., Laurin, R., Slotnick, J., Nettesheim, T., and McDonald, J. (2004). Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes. Environ. Res. 95: 247–265.
[15]
NADP (2008). National Atmospheric Deposition Program: Annual data summaries. Available at http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/dataReports.aspx (last access: September 2016).
[16]
WHO (2006). World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality – 3rd ed.
[17]
Flanagan, P. J. (1986). Parameters of water quality: Interpretation and standards (Vol. 6). An Foras Forbartha. Information and Training Centre.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved