Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
Development Assistance and Sustainable Development: A Critical Assessment
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 75-85   |   Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 40   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 1690   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Peder Hjorth, Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
Sustainable development is currently said to be an overriding development goal, also for development assistance. It requires new approaches that challenge not only economic rationality but also bureaucracies in ways that encourage political pluralism and the participation by civil society. As the gap between rich and poor increases and as the pressures on already strained systems constantly increase, the legitimacy of the development industry has increasingly been called into question. Development processes are nonlinear `open' systems that are extremely fluid, in which continuous learning is the sine qua non of being able to respond and intervene effectively. But superficial learning is common within the development industry, because real learning implies change and challenge, and many development failures are due to institutional rather than technical problems. Somehow, agencies and managers have largely allowed the indications of new and better approaches or opportunities go undetected. They seem not to understand that building people's capacity to learn and make connections becomes more important than accumulating information about lessons learned in the past, and that it is more important to target interesting (positive or negative) experiences for learning instead of `averaging' experience across the board. A revamping of policies is urgently needed. This paper tries to provoke a more productive discussion about development assistance which goes beyond pervasive blind faith and thoughtless mantras and discusses some ideological and structural foundations that have prevented the development industry from making progress towards sustainable development. It analyzes what can be done and asserts that it is clear that, if sustainable development is to be supported and realized, it has to be built on the consent and support of those whose lives are affected. Promoting sustainability and understanding and tackling the roots of poverty is a challenge that requires unlocking material resources and allowing people to take part in social, economic and environmental decision making. There is a need to draw on more diverse perspectives and to cut across sectoral boundaries to counter the monovalent approaches that have dominated mainstream development assistance practice. To that end, there is a dire need develop frameworks that can help actors understand the real meaning of sustainable development.
Keywords
Sustainable Development, Poverty, Rhetoric, Organizational Learning, Social Learning, Development Assistance, Complexity, Uncertainty, Dogma, Paradigms
Reference
[1]
Alacevich, M. (2012) Visualizing Uncertainties, or How Albert Hirschman and The World Bank Disagreed on Project Appraisal and Development Approaches Policy Research Working Paper 6260, The World Bank, Washington
[2]
Alkire, S. (2004) “Culture, Poverty, and External Intervention.” In Rao, V. and Walton, M. (eds) Culture and Public Action, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
[3]
Antonovsky, A. (1998). “The sense of coherence: An historical and future perspective.” In H.I McCubbin, E.A. Thompson, A.I. Thompson, & J.E. Fromer (Eds.), Stress, coping, and health in families: Sense of coherence and resiliency (pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[4]
Baker, M. (2013): Energy supply – Lack of leadership will lose the argument http://www.ethicalcorp.com 2013-11-20
[5]
Barder, O. (2009) What Is Poverty Reduction?, [Online] Working Paper Number 170, Center for Global Development, Washington D.C. Available from: www.cgdev.org/files/1421599_file_ Barder _Poverty_Reduction.pdf [Accessed: 10.06.2014]
[6]
Barder, O. (2012) “Complexity, Adaptation, and Results” Center for Global Development: http://www.cgdev.org/blog/complexity-adaptation-and-results (accessed 17.09.2014)
[7]
Braithwaite, J. (1999): ‘Accountability and Governance under the New Regulatory State’, Australian Journal of Public Administration 58, 1, 90-97
[8]
Burges, S. (2014) “Brazil's International Development Co-operation: Old and New Motivations” Development Policy Review, 2014, 32 (3): 355–374
[9]
Cammack, P.(2001): ‘Neoliberalism, the World Bank, and the Politics of Development’, in U. Kothari, and M. Minogue eds: Development Theory and Practice: Critical Perspectives Basingstoke, Palgrave, pp 157-90
[10]
Chambers, R. (2010) Paradigms, Poverty and Adaptive Pluralism. IDS Working Paper 344, Institute of Development Studies 2010.
[11]
Douglas, M. (1986): How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
[12]
Eade, D. (2010): “Preface” in Cornwall, A. and Eade, D. (Eds.). Deconstructing Development Debate: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Practical Action Publishing, London.
[13]
Edwards, M. (1997) ‘Organizational learning in non-governmental organizations: What have we learned?’ Public Administration and Development 17, 235-250.
[14]
Garcia, J. J. (2012) Remarks to the conference ‘Regional Reactions to the Rise of Brazil’, The Australian National Centre for Latin American Studies at the Australian National University, Canberra, 13 September. http://vimeo.com/51196267 (last accessed 25May 2014).
[15]
Gudeman, S. (1992): ‘Remodeling the House of Economics: Culture and Innovation.’American Ethnologist, 19 no. 1.
[16]
Gudeman, S. (2005): ‘Realism, Relativism and Reason: What’s Economic Anthropology All About?’ in Löfving, S. (Ed.). Peopled Economies Interface, Uppsala.
[17]
Heidegger, M. (1962): Being and Time, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
[18]
Holton, R. (1992): Economy and Society, Routledge, London.
[19]
Horta, K. (2006): “The World Bank's Decade for Africa: A New Dawn for Development Aid” Yale J. Int'l Aff. 4 (2005-2006)
[20]
Horwitz, S. (1995): ‘Monetary Exchange as an Extra-linguistic Social Communication Process’ in Individuals, Institutions, Interpretations ed. D.L. Prychitko (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company).
[21]
Huppert, W. (2009) Coping with complexity Innovative approaches to an emerging issue in agricultural water management The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
[22]
Jaycox, E. V. K. (1993): “Capacity Building: The Missing Link in African Development” (address delivered at the African‐American Institute Conference on African Capacity‐Building: Effective and Enduring Partnerships, Reston, Va., 1993).
[23]
Jim Yong Kim (2012): World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim’s Speech at George Washington University - The World Bank Group Strategy: A Path to End Poverty, Washington, DC, United States.
[24]
Kates et al. (2001): “Policy Forum; ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT; Sustainability Science” Science 292(2001) 641–642.
[25]
Keynes, J.M (1936): The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
[26]
Korten, D.C. (1980) “Community Organisations and Rural Development Projects: A Learning Process Approach” Publ. Admin. Review 40(5), 1980, pp. 480-511
[27]
Kühl, S. (2009): “Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations” Development and Change 40(3): 551–577.
[28]
Lappé, F.M., Collins, J. and Kinley, D. (1981): Aid as Obstacle: Twenty Questions about our Foreign aid and the Hungry Institute for Food and Development Policy, San Francisco.
[29]
Lautensach, A. and Lautensach, S. (2013): Why 'Sustainable Development' Is Often Neither: A Constructive Critique. Challenges in Sustainability | 2013 | Volume 1 | Issue 1 | Pages 3–15
[30]
Leff, E. (1993). "Marxism and the environmental question: from the critical theory of production to an environmental rationality for sustainable development." Capitalism, Nature, Socialism: Journal of Socialist Ecology 4(1): 44-66.
[31]
Magnus, G. (2014) The unevenness problem. March 5, 2014 visited (9/3-14). http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/prospector/the-dangers-of-inequality/#.UxzoQoV1kdW
[32]
Lele, S. (1991) “Sustainable Development: A Critical Review” World Development, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 607-621
[33]
Mawdsley, E. (2012): From recipients to donors: emerging powers and the changing development landscape Zed Books, London
[34]
Mawdsley, E., Savage, L. & Kim, S-M (2014) “ A ‘post-aid world’? Paradigm shift in foreign aid and development cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum” The Geographical Journal Vol. 180, No. 1, 2014, pp. 27-38
[35]
McCloskey D.,N. (2009) “Rhetoric Matters: Ethical Standards in a Humanistic Science of Economics.” Challenge Vol. 52 Issue 4 Jul/Aug2009.
[36]
McCloskey D.,N. (2010) Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.
[37]
Mohan Goel (2013): “Challenges and Relevance of Economics as Queen of Social Sciences in Present Scenario” European Scientific Journal (ESJ) Special Edition No. 1.
[38]
Moyo, D. (2009) Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is Another Way for Africa, Macmillan Publishers .
[39]
Parson, T & Smelser, N. 1956. Economy and Society, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
[40]
OED (2005): 2004 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness World bank Operations Evaluation Department, The World Bank, Washington.
[41]
Orwell, G. (1946) “In Front of Your Nose” First published: Tribune. — GB, London. — March 22, 1946.
[42]
Pezzoli, K, 1997, ’Sustainable Development: A trandisciplinary overview of the literature’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , vol.40 no.5, p. 549-574
[43]
Ranganathan, T. C. A (2012) ‘BRIC Bank in Concept Stage, May Take Time’, The Economic Times, 23 April.
[44]
Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopín G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R. Great transition: The promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm Environment Institute Polestar Report no. 10. Boston, MA, USA: SEI; 2002. Available from: http://www.seiinternational.org/publications?pid=1547 (accessed on 2 March 2014).
[45]
Rodrik, D. (2013). “What is wrong (and right) in economics? http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2013/05/what-is-wrong-and-right-in-economics.html Accessed 2013-09-20
[46]
Rondinelli, D. A. (1983) Development Projects as Policy Experiments:.An Adaptive Approach to Development Administration. Routledge, London.
[47]
Ruttan, V. W. (1989) ‘Why Foreign Economic Assistance?’, Economic Development and Change 37(2): 411–24.
[48]
Schuurman, F. (1993): Beyond the Impasse: New Directions in Development Theory. London, Zed Books
[49]
Sen, A. (2004) ‘How Does Culture Matter?’ In Rao, V. and Walton, M. (eds) Culture and Public Action, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
[50]
SFSO, 2001: Swiss Federal Statistical Office (SFSO), Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), and Federal Office for Spatial Development (ARE): 2001, ‘MONET project – From the definition to the postulates of sustainable development’, Neuchatel.
[51]
Stiglitz, J. (2002) Globalization and its discontents, Penguin, London.
[52]
Storr, V.H. (2009) “Why the Market? Markets as Social and Moral Spaces.” Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 12, Number 2 (Fall 2009): 277–296
[53]
Thoreau, D. H. “Life Without Principle” The Atlantic Monthly, 1863
[54]
Tukey, J. (1962): The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33(1), 1962, p. 13.
[55]
de Vries, B.,J., M. (2012): Sustainability Science Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[56]
Willis, K. (2005) Theories and Practices of Development, Routledge, Oxon and New York.
[57]
World Bank (1998) Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[58]
World Bank (2002): Perspectives on Development Washington, World Bank.
[59]
World Bank (2005): 2004 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness: The World Bank’s Contributions to Poverty Reduction Operations Evaluation Department. http://ieg.worldbank.org/Data/reports/2004_arde.pdf (accessed 14.07.2014)
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved