Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Perceived Benefits of ABC Implementation in Moroccan Enterprises: Results of an Empirical Study
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 24-28   |   Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 119   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 3195   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Azzouz Elhamma, National School of Business and Management, Ibn Tofaïl University, Kenitra, Morocco.
Abstract
During the last decades, the Activity Based Costing (ABC) represents a new model in the management accounting. It has been the subject of several research papers in developed countries (USA, UK, Australia, etc.). However, this type of works is still absent in developing countries like the Arab area for example. In this context, this article highlights the results of an empirical study on the relationship between ABC method and organizational performance in Moroccan enterprises. The results based on a sample of 62 firms showed that 12.9% of the responding companies reported using the ABC method. The results by using the Student's t-test for a difference in means indicate that the management accounting system based on ABC method results in a better performance for enterprises that have adopted it.
Keywords
Activity Based Costing (ABC), Performance, Competitiveness, Profitability, Productivity
Reference
[1]
Alcouffe, S. 2002. La diffusion de l’ABC en France : une étude empirique utilisant la théorie de la diffusion des innovations. 23rd Congress of the French Association of Accounting, Toulouse, May.
[2]
Armitage, H. M. and Nicholson, R. 1993. Activity based costing: a survey of Canadian practice. Issue paper n° 3, Society of Management Accountants of Canada.
[3]
Baird, K. M., Harrison, G.L. and Reeve. R.C. 2004. Adoption of activity management practices: a note on the extent of adoption and the influence of organizational and cultural factors. Management Accounting Research 15: 383-399.
[4]
Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R. and Chen, T. 2008. The role of manufacturing practices in mediating the impact of activity-based costing on plant performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (1):1-19.
[5]
Bescos P.-L., Cauvin E. 2000. L’ABC/ABM: où en est-on actuellement? Echanges 168: 23-26.
[6]
Bescos, P.L., Cauvin, E., Gosselin, M. and Yoshikawa, T. 2001. La mise en place de la méthode ABC/ABM au Canada, en France et au Japon – Étude comparative. 22nd Congress of the French Association of Accounting, Metz, May.
[7]
Bescos, P-L., Cauvin, E. and Gosselin, M. 2002. Activity-Based Costing and Activity Based Management: a comparison of the practices in Canada and France. Revue Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, numéro special, mai: 229-244.
[8]
Bjornenak, T. 1997. Diffusion and accounting: the case of ABC in Norway. Management Accounting Research 8 (1): 3-17.
[9]
Cauvin, E. and Neumann, B. 2007. French Cost Accounting Methods: ABC and other Structural Similarities. Journal of Cost Management, May-June.
[10]
Chenhall, R. H. and Langfield-Smith, K. 1998. The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (3): 243-264.
[11]
Chongruksut, W. and Brooks A. 2005. The adoption and implementation of activity-based costing in Thailand. Asian Review of Accounting 13 (2): 1-17.
[12]
Cooper, R. 1990. Implementing an Activity-Based Costing System. Journal of Costing Management, spring: 33-42.
[13]
Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R. S. 1988. How Cost Accounting Distorts Product Costs, Management Accounting 69 (10) : 20-27.
[14]
Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R. S. 1992. Activity-Based Systems: Measuring the Costs of Resource Usage. Accounting Horizons 6 (3): 1-13.
[15]
Dahlgren, J., Holmström, M. and Nehler, H. 2001. Activity Based Costing diffusion and adoption. Congress EAA, Athens.
[16]
De La Villarmois, O. and Tondeur, H. 1996. L’ABC en France : les déterminants de la mise en place. Echanges, Supplément au n° 125 : 51-62.
[17]
Drury, C. and Tayles, M. 1994. Product costing in UK manufacturing organizations. The European Accounting Review 3(3): 443-469.
[18]
Dugdale, D. 1990. The Uses of Activity-Based Costing. Management Accounting, October: 36-38.
[19]
Elhamma A. 2012. L’impact de la stratégie sur le contenu des tableaux de bord : cas des entreprises au Maroc, Revue Congolaise de Gestion, n°14, Juillet – Décembre, p.57-77.
[20]
Elhamma A. 2012. The relationship between Firm Size, Activity Based Costing and Performance: An application on Moroccan enterprises, Journal of Accounting Business & Management, 19 (1), p. 90-102.
[21]
Elhamma A. 2013. Influence de la taille, la stratégie et la structure organisationnelle sur l’adoption de la comptabilité par activités au Maroc, la Revue Gestion et Organisation, p.27-32.
[22]
Elhamma A. and Yi Fei Z. 2013. The relationship between activity-based costing, business strategy and performance in Moroccan enterprises. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, n°1, pp. 22-38.
[23]
Foster, G. and Swenson, D. W. 1997. Measuring the Success of Activity-Based Cost Management and its Determinants. Journal of Management Accounting Research 9: 109-141.
[24]
Gosselin, M. 1997. The effect of strategy and organisational structure on the adoption and implementation of accounting-based costing. Accounting, Organisations and Society 22 (2): 105-122.
[25]
Gosselin, M. 2000. Influence de la stratégie sur l’adoption et la mise en œuvre d’une comptabilité par activités. Finance, Contrôle et Stratégie 3(4) : 37-56.
[26]
Gueye, M. 1997. Contribution à la réflexion sur la mise en place d’outils d’analyse de gestion adaptés au contexte actuel des entreprises - L’approche par les activités et les processus : l’exemple de la France, Doctoral thesis, Ecole Centrale des Arts et Manufactures de Paris.
[27]
Innes, J. and Mitchell, F. 1991. Activity based costing: a survey of CIMA members. Management Accounting, October: 28-30.
[28]
Innes, J., Mitchell, F. and Sinclair, D. 2000. Activity based costing in the UK's largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management Accounting Research 11: 349-362.
[29]
Ittner, C.D., Lanen W.N. and Larcker D.F. 2002. The association between Activity Based Costing and manufacturing performance. Journal of Accounting Research 40, (3): 711-726.
[30]
Johnson, H.T. 1990. Beyond Product Costing: A Challenge to Cost Management’s Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Cost Management 4 (3): 15-21.
[31]
Kiani, M. and Sangeladji, M. 2003. An empirical study about the use of ABC/ABM models by some of the fortune 500 largest industrial corporations in the USA. Journal of American Academy of Business 3(1/2): 174-182.
[32]
Krumwiede, K. P. 1998. The implementation stages of Activity-Based Costing and the impact of contextual and organizational factors. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10: 239-277.
[33]
Krumwiede, K.P. and Roth, H.P. 1997. Implementing Information Technology Innovations: The Activity-Based Costing Example, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal 62 (4): 4-13.
[34]
Malmi, T. 1999. Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24: 649-672.
[35]
McGowan, A. S. 1998. Perceived benefits of ABCM implementation. Accounting Horizons 12(1): 31–50.
[36]
McGowan, A.S. and Klammer, T P. 1997. Satisfaction with Activity-Based Cost Management implementation, Journal of Management Accounting Research 9: 217-237.
[37]
Moalla, H. 2007. Les mécanismes de diffusion, d’adoption et de rejet de la méthode ABC dans l’environnement tunisien. 28th Congress of the Francophone Association of Accounting, Poitiers, May.
[38]
Naro, G. 2003. Compétitivité, rentabilité, productivité, emploi … face à la variété des critères de performance. Revue internationale des relations de travail 1 (4) :89-124.
[39]
Ngongang, D. 2010. Analyse de la pratique des coûts dans les PMI camerounaises. Revue Libanaise de Gestion et d’Economie, n°5.
[40]
Pierce, B. and Brown, R. 2004. An empirical study of activity based systems in Ireland. The Irish Accounting Review 11(1):55.
[41]
Pizzini, M. J. 2006. The relation between cost-system design, managers evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: an empirical study of US hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (2):179–210.
[42]
Rahmouni, A . F. 2008. La mise en œuvre de la comptabilité par activités dans les entreprises françaises. Doctoral thesis. Université du Sud Toulon– VAR.
[43]
Ruhanita, M. and Daing, N.I. 2007. Factors influencing activity based costing (ABC) adoption in manufacturing industry. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 4 (2): 113-124.
[44]
Sartorius, K., Eitzen, C. and Kamala, P. 2007. The design and implementation of Activity Based Costing (ABC): a South African survey. Meditari Accountancy Research 15 (2): 1-21.
[45]
Shields, M D. 1995. An Empirical Analysis of Firms: implementation experiences with Activity-Based Costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7: 148-166.
[46]
Shim, E. and Sudit, E. 1995. How manufacturers price products. Management Accounting 76 (8):37-39.
[47]
Tayles, M. and Drury, C. 2001. Autopsy of a stalling ABC system: a case study of activity based cost management and performance improvement. The 24th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Athens, Greece, April 18-20.
[48]
Turney, P.B.B. 1991. How Activity-Based Costing Helps Reduce Costs. Journal of Cost Management 4 (4): 29-35.
[49]
Zaman, M. 2009. The Impact Of Activity Based Costing On Firm Performance: The Australian Experience. International Review of Business Research Papers 5 (4): 200-208.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved